Independent Asylum Commission's Review of the
UK Asylum System
UNISON Scotland's Response to the Independent
Asylum Commission's Review of the UK Asylum System
May 2007
Executive Summary
-
UNISON Scotland is pleased to note the establishment
of the Independent Asylum Commission and welcomes the opportunity
to contribute to the review of the asylum system in the UK.
-
UNISON Scotland represents over 100,000 local
government members in Scotland, more than 25,000 of whom work
in social care, many of whom are at the front line of delivery
of services to asylum seekers and their families.
-
UNISON Scotland believes that immigration
enriches our society and we would like to see those families
who have lived in this country for more than a year, be granted
an amnesty and leave to remain.
-
UNISON Scotland's concerns arose from the
treatment of children within the asylum system, particularly
in relation to the removals process.
-
UNISON Scotland believes that these actions
by the immigration services breach the human rights of all
concerned and breach the rights of the children
-
UNISON Scotland is deeply concerned at the
reservation which has been placed on the UNCRC by the UK government
which, we believe, could lead to the UK government believing
that it is not accountable for providing such protection.
-
UNISON Scotland is clear in its view that
the children of failed asylum seekers should only be separated
from their families if they are at risk of significant harm.
-
UNISON Scotland is very clear that our members
will not collude with the deportation process. However, we
take the view that UNISON members should, where appropriate
provide a service to asylum seeker families in accordance
with social work legislation and their professional codes
of ethics.
-
UNISON Scotland has serious concerns about
the treatment of asylum seekers who have been detained in
the Dungavel detention centre in Lanarkshire, Scotland where
our members working in local hospitals have raised concerns
about the treatment of those who have been brought to hospital
for medical care.
-
UNISON Scotland believes that the detention
of children without due process is unacceptable and is a clear
breach of their rights under UNCRC and domestic legislation.
-
UNISON Scotland is also very concerned about
the decision making process in relation to asylum which should
take account of the circumstances of all family members, particularly
the children. We believe there is a need to introduce the
principles of the Children (Scotland) Act into asylum proceedings
in Scotland to assist with this.
-
UNISON Scotland is also very concerned about
the issue of the children's safety and welfare in their country
of origin and believes that more work needs to be done on
the quality of information and assessments in countries to
which children are being deported.
-
We are also concerned about unaccompanied
asylum seeker children and what seems to be a policy to return
them to their country of origin once they reach 18, again,
we understand, without adequate checking or preparation.
-
UNISON Scotland welcomes the setting up of
an independent inspectorate to monitor the quality of the
decision making of the Immigration and Nationality Department
and their removals policy.
Introduction
UNISON Scotland is pleased to note the establishment
of the Independent Asylum Commission and welcomes the opportunity
to contribute to the review of the asylum system in the UK.
UNISON Scotland represents over 100,000 local government
members in Scotland, more than 25,000 of whom work in social care.
Many of these members are at the front line of delivery of services
to asylum seekers and their families and they are very unhappy
at the way in which they are expected to deliver the legislation
aimed at removing families of failed asylum seekers from Scotland.
UNISON Scotland has been concerned for some time
about the practices of the immigration services in relation to
the treatment of asylum seekers, particularly asylum seeker families.
We have been particularly alarmed by the practices of removal
by dawn raids and the detention of children and families. We are
worried at the impact of these practices on the children of asylum
seekers and we believe that it breaches the rights of these children
under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), as
well as domestic legislation, both UK and Scottish, which states
that the welfare of the child must be paramount. We are also concerned
at the effect on other children, whether or not asylum seekers,
of seeing their friends "disappeared" overnight by the
state.
UNISON Scotland believes that immigration enriches
our society and we would like to see those families who have lived
in this country for more than a year, be granted an amnesty and
leave to remain. We are aware that many failed asylum seekers
have been in Scotland for many years. The children and their families
are well integrated into our communities and schools, and many
children have been born in this country. It is our policy to campaign
for an amnesty for such families.
Evidence
The treatment of vulnerable groups in the asylum
process
UNISON Scotland's concerns arose from the treatment
of children within the asylum system, especially in relation to
the removals process. The experiences of families and children
have been widely reported in the media. UNISON has also had contact
with professionals and others working in this field who have heard
directly from the families of their experiences. Families have
been taken out of their homes in their night clothes; the adults
and older children have been removed in handcuffs and often quite
young children have, on many occasions been separated from their
parents during the journey to the detention centres. We are particularly
aware of one instance where a mother was separated from her child
during a long journey to a detention centre in England, leading
to considerable distress on both their parts.
As stated above UNISON Scotland believes that these
actions by the immigration services breach the human rights of
all concerned and breach the rights of the children which are
set down by domestic legislation, in Scotland, the Children (Scotland)
Act 1995, and by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child,
to which the UK is a signatory. In particular it breaches their
right under domestic law and the UNCRC to have their "best
interests a primary consideration in all actions"; their
right to express a view and to have that view taken into account
in all matters affecting them and their right to protection from
abuse and neglect.
For this reason, UNISON Scotland is deeply concerned
at the reservation which has been placed on the UNCRC by the UK
government. We believe that this further disadvantages already
very vulnerable children. It has implications for all asylum seeker
children, including unaccompanied asylum seeker children who are
a particularly vulnerable group. The UNCRC requires the State
to provide special protection for such children who are deprived
of his/her own family. There is a risk that in placing a reservation
on the UNCRC, the UK government will see themselves as not having
to be accountable for providing such protection. The new Home
Office guidance on this matter which is out for consultation would
appear to emphasise this risk.
We believe that there is a need to recognise that
many asylum seeker children have already had very damaging experiences
and may already be severely scarred both psychologically and possibly
physically. They may well need additional services to help them
cope with their experiences, and certainly do not need the additional
trauma of dawn raids and detention.
UNISON Scotland is clear in its view that the children
of failed asylum seekers should only be separated from their families
if they are at risk of significant harm. Separating these children
from their parents even for short periods of time, for example
as part of the removals or detention process, can result in further
and lifelong emotional damage.
We were also very concerned to learn that immigration
officials involved in the removals process were not subject to
enhanced disclosure checks, a requirement for all other professionals
working with children. We welcome the introduction of this requirement
and we understand that most have now been disclosure checked.
However, this is another example of the Home Office's failure
to recognise the needs and rights of asylum seeker children.
UNISON Scotland is very clear that asylum seeker children are
"children in need" as defined by the Children (Scotland)
Act and are therefore entitled to all the services and consideration
that should apply to such children. These children's previous
experiences often make them particularly vulnerable. However,
this not recognised by immigration and asylum legislation and
practices of the immigration service.
UNISON Scotland has held discussions with the Scottish
Executive in relation to the proposed protocol with the Home Office
to address concerns about the removal process and in particular
dawn raids. UNISON Scotland is very clear that our members will
not collude with the deportation process. It is not their role
to put a human face on inhumane practice.
However, we take the view that UNISON members should,
where appropriate provide a service to asylum seeker families
in accordance with social work legislation and their professional
codes of ethics. UNISON Scotland's Social Work Issues Group (SWIG),
along with the British Association of Social Workers (BASW), has
produced a guide for members who are working with asylum seeker
children, child's welfare paramount? which is attached
to this submission.
The guide provides a framework for ethical practice
for UNISON and BASW members who work with the children of asylum
seekers, and a resource pack for workers.
UNISON has expressed some support for the Scottish
Executive's proposals to address the needs of the children of
failed asylum seekers, by having an assessment of their needs
prior to any action to deport. This would involve a lead professional
being identified to co-ordinate an assessment to which all the
professionals involved with the child would contribute, including
school and health staff. We understand that whilst this may not
influence the decision to deport, it could influence the nature
and timing of the deportation, for example to allow a child to
sit key exams; or to complete a course of medical treatment. Unfortunately,
this has not yet been put into practice and we have now learned
that these measures will only apply in the "legacy"
cases. Meantime, children are still being detained and deported
without such an assessment, with all the damage this may cause.
UNISON Scotland's Social Work Issues Group is now
considering a similar booklet for staff who work with adult asylum
seekers, particularly those working in the field of mental health.
We are aware that many adult asylum seekers are also very vulnerable,
both because of their previous experiences and because of their
experiences of the asylum process.
The detention of asylum seekers
UNISON Scotland has serious concerns about the treatment
of asylum seekers who have been detained in the Dungavel detention
centre in Lanarkshire, Scotland. UNISON members working in local
hospitals have raised concerns about the treatment of those who
have been brought for medical care and described a situation where
a woman asylum seeker was handcuffed to a bed when going to surgery.
UNISON Scotland has written to NHS Lanarkshire and the Home Office
to express the view that asylum seekers should have the same rights
to dignity in medical treatment as the rest of the population
and to express concerns that healthcare staff are forced to work
within such practices. We believe that such practices seriously
compromise the codes of practice of healthcare professionals.
UNISON Scotland believes that the detention of children
without due process is unacceptable and is a clear breach of their
rights under UNCRC and domestic legislation. It is our view that
the locking up of asylum seeker families in this way has no place
in a civilised society and should end.
It is UNISON Scotland policy to campaign:
- for the closure of Dungavel and other detention centres
in the UK, instead of current Government plans to expand the
facilities;
- to seek a more humane way to deal with asylum seekers which
keeps families together and recognises their needs, including
the education of their children in mainstream schools;
- to work to ensure an end to enforced detention of asylum
seekers and their families which breaches their human rights;
- to attempt to build a greater understanding of the plight
of refugees and asylum seekers and to highlight the fact that
the vast majority are genuine cases deserving full support.
The asylum determination and appeals process
UNISON Scotland is also very concerned about the
decision making process in relation to asylum. The focus of the
asylum application and decisions about leave to remain and deportation
are based exclusively on the circumstances of the applicant. In
the case of families, this can often be one of the parents and
it is their circumstances only that will be considered. In these
cases we believe that there is a need to take account of the circumstances
of all family members, particularly the children, and to have
regard to their welfare in decisions about asylum and deportation.
We understand that some of our legal colleagues
have begun to bring the welfare of the children more to the fore
in bringing legal challenges against deportation and have, for
example, asked the court to require a report on the children's
circumstances as part of judicial reviews. We believe there is
a need to clearly introduce the principles of the Children (Scotland)
Act into asylum proceedings in Scotland, in order to ensure that
the welfare of the child is fully considered when asylum decisions
are made.
We welcome the recent agreement reached between
the Scottish Executive and the Home Office to include an assessment
of the needs of all family members in respect of the "legacy
cases" in Scotland and would like to see this approach extended
to all asylum seeker families. However, we will want to monitor
very carefully how this will work in practice, to ensure that
welfare assessments are fully taken into account.
UNISON Scotland is also very concerned about the
issue of the children's safety and welfare in their country of
origin, and how this can be assured. We are unconvinced about
the basis on which the Home Office decides that countries are
safe to return to and again, there seems to be no attempt to consider
specifically the needs and welfare of the children. We believe
that more work needs to be done on the quality of information
and assessments in countries children are being deported to. We
believe that more use should be made of International Social Work
services both for information about the situation families will
be returning to and support for families once there.
We are also concerned about unaccompanied asylum
seeker children and what seems to be a policy to return them to
their country of origin once they reach 18, again, we understand,
without adequate checking or preparation.
UNISON Scotland welcomes the setting up of an independent inspectorate
to monitor the quality of the decision making of the Immigration
and Nationality Department and their removals policy. We believe
that there should be greater independent scrutiny of the decision
making processes and more accountability.
For Further Information Please Contact:
Matt Smith, Scottish Secretary
UNISONScotland
UNISON House
14, West Campbell Street,
Glasgow G2 6RX
Tel 0845 355 0845 Fax 0141 342 2835
e-mail matt.smith@unison.co.uk
Submissions index |
Home
|