GPF
backs Edinburgh's stock transfer fight
Edinburgh Council is spending thousands of pounds of tenants'
money to convince them to privatise their housing. But now,
to combat this, UNISON's General Political Fund has backed
the City of Edinburgh Branch in a campaign involving 25,000
colour broadsheets for tenants, advertising and a range of
other initiatives working with tenants' campaign groups.
"Most tenants do not believe they've been given enough information
and UNISON is urging them to Vote No, and If You don't Know,
then Vote No", said John Stevenson, UNISON Edinburgh Branch
Secretary.
"But this is also about jobs. The Business Plan envisages
cuts in support services from day one - and that means staff".
A recent report by the independent Tenants Information Service
(TIS) confirms many of the fears tenants across Edinburgh
have expressed. While it states that some of the City of Edinburgh
Housing Association (CEHA) plan is realistic, it exposes huge
problem areas like:-
- The new landlord does not actually have the 'promised'
money for the major demolitions and improvements. Instead
all this work is dependent on future funding bids.
- Unless CEHA can find £70 million to plug a hole in their
finances, rent rises are likely after the 5-year period.
The promise is for rents to rise at no more than inflation.
But the report warns "beyond that time CEHA's capacity to
continue with that level of rent rises is an aspiration,
not a promise".
- The report says predictions of higher rent rises after
five years are 'realistic'.
- The council has over-estimated the income for CEHA. Unrealistic
occupancy levels and failing to take into account increased
building costs mean that there are further holes in their
finances.
- TIS says that £38 million is needed for structural repairs
but CEHA has only set aside £9 million.
- The business plan states that there is an estimated £90
million for neighbourhood improvements. TIS say that this
is "insecure" with its availability depending on the decisions
of others.
- CEHA expects to reduce staffing costs (e.g. cut jobs)
in caretaking, concierge staff and anti-social behaviour
staff. TIS says these plans are 'very ambitious' and would
entail plans not contemplated so far. It has to start cutting
'housing management' costs in the very first year if it
is to keep on target financially.
But, more worryingly, the business plan is only an intention
on day one. After that it can change. The report says, "By
its nature a business plan will change, through systematic
updating."
"It will always be possible to vary these things to ensure
viable finances year on year", the report explains.
"That could mean there would be more job losses less repairs,
higher rents and fewer improvements than the business plan
promises", said Barbara Foubister, UNISON Edinburgh Branch
Chair. See more at www.unison-edinburgh.org.uk
headlines . top
|