Devolution - the next steps?
The Scottish Parliament belongs to the people of Scotland
and not to the political parties. Any means of reviewing its
powers must reflect that fact, says UNISON Scotland Secretary
Matt Smith.
UNISON has always been to the forefront of the debate on
Scotland's governance. We supported and campaigned for devolution
over many years and were a major funder of the 'Yes/ Yes'
campaign in 1997.
This supported both the establishment of a Scottish Parliament,
and one that would have the power to raise, or lower the standard
rate of income tax by a margin of 3 pence in the pound.
It is important therefore that we maintain our interest
and involvement in this matter, particularly now that Scotland's
main political parties have reengaged the debate.
For the Government in Scotland, the SNP has launched a 'National
Conversation' on Scotland's constitutional future. This supports
the creation of an independent Scotland and sets the scene
for that debate. The Scottish Parliament on a joint initiative
from the other parties - Labour, Liberal Democrats and the
Conservatives - has decided to establish a Constitutional
Commission to consider further the powers available to Holyrood.
This will involve the UK government because these matters
are reserved under the Scotland Act.
UNISON has always been open to discuss further powers for
the Scottish Parliament while maintaining its opposition to
independence. So we should welcome the debate. But in doing
so we need to make our position clear.
The last time there was a major debate there was established
a Constitutional Convention. Trade unions along with many
others in civic Scotland played a key role.
Political parties were involved though the Conservative
Party steadfastly refused to take part; and the SNP only came
on board during the latter stages of the Convention's work.
Civic Scotland took the lead and gave the Convention its
great strength, credibility and ultimately its victory.
This time the proposed Constitutional Commission comes from
the initiative of the opposition parties in the Scottish Parliament.
They share one overwhelming policy and that is to maintain
the unity of the United Kingdom.
UNISON agrees with that position but does not accept that
the status quo is acceptable. If the three parties are offering
a genuine opportunity to engage in a debate about the powers
of the Scottish Parliament then UNISON will wish to engage
in the process.
The debate needs to be about the opportunity for new powers
and not merely a response to the Scottish Government's own
discussion paper.
UNISON is already engaged in the debate about Scotland's
future. We have made clear our desire to explore further the
extension of powers and at last year's STUC we supported a
call for such an enquiry.
As recently as December, the Scottish Council of UNISON
agreed to support a proposal to give to the Scottish Parliament
borrowing powers which have so far been denied.
The proposal to establish a Constitutional Commission needs
to be taken seriously but our support should not be unconditional.
It must be about opening the debate both on powers and on
funding. Real engagement with civic Scotland is required.
Trade unions need to play a significant role. If and when
we are satisfied that there is a desire to have a debate then
we should become involved.
The Scottish Parliament belongs to the people of Scotland
and not to the political parties. Any means of reviewing its
powers must reflect that fact.
headlines . top
|