| [Your address and phone 
              number] [the date]
 To: [ Your local] MSP Scottish Parliament
 Edinburgh EH99 1SP
 Dear Mr/Ms [your local/regional] MSP-,   JUSTICE FOR LGPS MEMBERS  As one of your constituents I am writing to ask for your urgent 
                help in securing justice for members of the Local Government Pension 
                Scheme (LGPS) in Scotland.  As you may know negotiations have been taking place over the 
                future of the LGPS, alongside separate talks through the Public 
                Services Forum (PSF) with Alan Johnston, Secretary of State at 
                the DTI, over the other public sector pension schemes. On 18 October 
                the PSF reached an agreement, endorsed by the Cabinet, on the 
                future of the NHS, civil service and teachers pension schemes 
                which included life-time protection of existing scheme benefits 
                and pensions age for existing members.  However in the negotiations on the LGPS, members are facing detrimental 
                proposals for the reform of their pension. These include the removal 
                of the 85 Rule and no protection for existing scheme members. 
               Although these LGPS negotiations technically only affect the 
                scheme in England and Wales at this stage, Tom McCabe MSP, the 
                Scottish Executive Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform, 
                has stated that he will remove the rule of 85 from the LGPS in 
                Scotland. Mr McCabe, following a similar decision taken by the 
                UK Government in respect of the LGPS in England and Wales, has 
                decided that retaining the rule would be incompatible with a forthcoming 
                EU Directive on Age Discrimination.  However both UNISON and CoSLA believe that the rule of 85 does 
                not conflict with the EU Directive and have legal opinion to confirm 
                this. This view was further strengthened when Katharina von Schnurbein, 
                the EU's spokeswoman on employment, social affairs and equal opportunities, 
                said the Scottish Executive was wrong. She cited Article 6 of 
                the directive, which states that governments can treat people 
                differently on the grounds of age in certain circumstances.  Von Schnurbein added: "It's an artificial debate [and one that] 
                is only going on in Britain. The directive has no influence on 
                pension value or pension age. It is completely up to the member 
                state. If they think it is reasonable for people to retire at 
                60, under EU law that is perfectly legal."  The abolition of the rule of 85 cannot and should not be allowed 
                to happen. Local government, police support staff, some Scottish 
                NDPBs, HE and FE support staff and those in community and voluntary 
                sector jobs covered by the LGPS are increasingly being asked to 
                work in joined up service delivery arrangements. Low paid LGPS 
                members, such as cleaners, janitors and classroom assistants in 
                schools work alongside teachers. They will be required to work 
                10 years longer than teachers if the government's proposals are 
                allowed to proceed. Joint initiatives across health and local 
                government would see current inequalities in pay and access to 
                career development made even worse by pension differences.  It is vital that we secure an agreement for equal treatment for 
                LGPS members. If not, there will be demoralisation and anger across 
                our public services hindering the reform process and leading to 
                industrial action ballots by the unions across the public services. 
               Already the LGPS is the least favourable of all the public sector 
                pension schemes, despite being the only funded scheme, with less 
                Government financing than other schemes. Our members are not pension 
                fat cats, 75% get a pension below £5000. The average pension 
                for a woman is a derisory £1,616 according to ODPM figures.  I would urge you to do everything you can to bring justice and 
                equal treatment to LGPS members in Scotland. The Scottish LGPS 
                is administered by the Scottish Public Pensions Agency with ministerial 
                responsibility resting with Tom McCabe MSP, Minister for Finance 
                and Public Service Reform. Therefore could you please write to 
                Tom McCabe urging him to treat Scottish LGPS members in the same 
                way as other public sector workers. Support the UNISON Scotland 
                campaign by signing either of the two motions (S2M-3872 Janis 
                Hughes: Local Government Pension Scheme and S2M-3845 Carolyn Leckie: 
                The Local Government Pension Scheme and Abolition of Rule of 85) 
                in the Scottish Parliament which call on the Scottish Executive 
                to initiate urgent discussions with COSLA and the relevant trade 
                unions to achieve a solution agreeable to all.  Please can you let me know your response and any action you have 
                taken to forward this campaign.  Yours Sincerely    Top |