UNISON home
UNISONScotland www
This is our archive website that is no longer being updated.
For the new website please go to
www.unison-scotland.org
Join UNISON
Join UNISON
Click here
Home News About us Join Us Contacts Help Resources Learning Links UNISON UK

 

 

 

Brighton 2003
CONFERENCE BRIEFINGS
Tues1 . Tues2 . Wed1 . Wed2 . Wed3 . Thur1 . Thur2 . Fri1 . Fri2
 

 

Report . Text of Motion

UNISON keeps Labour Link - time to reclaim our party

Delegates overwhelmingly backed a report on UNISON's Labour Link. UNISON members retain their unique choice to pay into the Labour affiliated fund, a non-affiliated political fund or no fund at all.

Dave Prentis gave a clear pledge that it was it was time to reclaim our Labour Party. Referring to the high pressured debate on the future of the political funds at 2001 Conference, Dave said "Your anger struck a chord with me. Two years on and it's no longer about a protest vote. Like it or not, those consulted supported the original structure. The recommendations do not ignore the issues. They are honest. They are straight.”

Dave continued, "Today you have the power, the means to make a difference. If we weaken our debate in the Labour Party, we weaken our voice. Weaken the link and you weaken our union!”

Conference threw out the first amendment calling for a third fund and a full membership ballot, moved by David O'Connor from Glasgow City. "Why does our union give money to a party that supports privatisation? The NEC were told to report and what came back two years later was no change. Our members have the right to choose the party we give our money to. This is not a political amendment. There are no political motives.”

Karie MurphyBut Glasgow Health's Karie Murphy rounded on the amendment as dishonest and "fundamentally wrong”. There would be a ballot of members in any case in 2005, and it was simplistic to talk about giving money to other parties.

"It's National and Scottish UNISON policy to reject the separatist agenda. So we would not be able to support the Scottish National Party or the Greens, but we could support the Conservative & Unionist Party. Our members would freak!”

Karie continued, "It's my money my choice. I'm not a Blairite, not an aspiring MP. The Government does deserve a doing, the fight is with the Government not with the Labour Party.”

The second amendment calling for even more reviews, was also lJohn Stevensonost decisively, but an Edinburgh call for more accountability in a ‘member-led' political fund was won.

John Stevenson, Edinburgh City explained "This will address some of the suspicion, whether that is justified or not, some of the mistrust, whether that is justified or not - but mainly to build confidence in our APF, to give it the impetus to be inclusive and to allow it to show that it and its membership are an inextricable part of UNISON, sharing, promoting and most of all, celebrating UNISON's values.

"That way we will have the strongest, the most authoritative and - most of all - the most representative voice to progress our policies in the political arena”.

top

Text of the motion passed:-

Conference approves the recommendations contained in the National Executive Council's report on the Political Fund Review:

1) the current political fund arrangements offering choice between the General Political Fund (GPF) and the Affiliated Political Fund (APF) should be retained. Alternatives, which remove this choice or introduce a third fund, should be rejected.

2) a new set of measures should be put in place to encourage members to make speedy and informed choices on their political fund options;

3) the changes made by the APF and the GPF to improve the operation of the funds should be endorsed and in particular the APF is urged to develop a programme of action in conjunction with the rest of the union to extend UNISON's influence at all levels of the Labour Party.

4) in addition the National Executive Council should consult with the National Affiliated Political Committee (NAPC) with a view to bringing forward proposed measures, including any necessary changes to UNISON rules, to ensure that the terms of its delegation of responsibility for the APF to the NAPC under Rule J.8.2 include:

a) that there is an appropriate degree of accountability between the APF and the union's structures at branch, regional and national levels, consistent with the need to preserve the APF's administrative separation and control by levy payers; and

b) that the structures of the APF embody the member-led principles used in the rest of UNISON's structure, by giving primacy and accountability to bodies, forums, based on delegations from branches;

c) all to be done consistently with the need for approval of the National APF Committee of any changes concerning the operation of the APF.

top